File #: 12-00119    Version: 1
Type: Agenda Item Status: Passed
File created: In control: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
On agenda: 2/14/2012 Final action: 2/14/2012
Title: Consider recommendations regarding the Santa Maria Courthouse Hazard Mitigation Program, Project No. 8518, Fifth Supervisorial District, as follows: a) Authorize the Chair to execute the attached Amendment No. 1 to the contract with Diani Building Corp., Inc., a local vendor, for the Santa Maria Court Complex Hazard Mitigation Program project in the amount of $35,707.25, for a total amended contract amount of $580,706.25; b) Re-authorize the Director of General Services, or his designee, to approve additional changes to the contract of an amount not to exceed 10% of the first $250,000.00 of the original contract plus 5% of the remaining contract amount, or $39,750.00 for this contract; and c) Find that a Notice of Exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section was filed with the County Clerk’s office on November 18, 2009, and that the contract amendment for the previously-approved project is therefore an administrative activity not constituting a “Project” within the meaning of CEQA, as s...
Sponsors: GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Attachments: 1. Board Letter, 2. Contract Amendment, 3. CEQA Notice of Exemption, 4. Contract Summary

Title

Consider recommendations regarding the Santa Maria Courthouse Hazard Mitigation Program, Project No. 8518, Fifth Supervisorial District, as follows:

 

a) Authorize the Chair to execute the attached Amendment No. 1 to the contract with Diani Building Corp., Inc., a local vendor, for the Santa Maria Court Complex Hazard Mitigation Program project in the amount of $35,707.25, for a total amended contract amount of $580,706.25;

 

b) Re-authorize the Director of General Services, or his designee, to approve additional changes to the contract of an amount not to exceed 10% of the first $250,000.00 of the original contract plus 5% of the remaining contract amount, or $39,750.00 for this contract; and

 

c) Find that a Notice of Exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section was filed with the County Clerk’s office on November 18, 2009, and that the contract amendment for the previously-approved project is therefore an administrative activity not constituting a “Project” within the meaning of CEQA, as set forth in 14 CCR 15378(b)(2).