File #: 20-00274    Version: 1
Type: Departmental Agenda Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 4/10/2020 In control: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
On agenda: 4/21/2020 Final action: 4/21/2020
Title: HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Santa Barbara West Coast Farms, LLC Cannabis Cultivation Appeal, Case No. 19APL-00000-00036, Third District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 3 HR.) If your Board wishes to affirm the Planning Commission's denial of the revised project, staff recommends that your Board take the following actions: a) Deny the Appeal, Case No. 19APL-00000-00036; b) Make the required findings, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings, for denial of the revised project, Case No. 19LUP 00000-00064; c) Determine that denial of the revised project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(5) and State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(4) and 15270(a); and d) Deny de novo the revised project, Case No. 19LUP-00000-00064; or Alternatively, if your Board wishes to uphold the appeal, reverse the Planning Commission's denial, and approve the revised project, staff recommends that you take the following actions: a) Uphol...
Sponsors: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Attachments: 1. Board Letter, 2. Attachment 1 - Findings for Denial, 3. Attachment 2 - CEQA Exemption Notice for Denial, 4. Attachment 3 - Revised Findings for Approval, 5. Attachment 4 - Revised Conditions of Approval, 6. Attachment 5 - Revised CEQA 15168(c)(4) Checklist, 7. Attachment 6, 8. Attachment 7, 9. Attachment 8, 10. Attachment 9 - BOS Appeal Application, 11. Attachment 10 - PEIR for the Cannabis Land Use Ordinance and Licensing Program, 17EIR-00000-00003, 12. Attachment 11 - CBAR Minutes, 13. Attachment 12 - APAC 4-19-19 Approved Minutes, 14. Attachment 13 - REVISED 2020.04.09, 15. Attachment 14 - Ag Commr Working Group - Pesticide Drift Mitigation Considerations, 16. Attachment 15 Odor Abatement Plan, 17. Attachment 16 OdorMemo (1), 18. Attachment 17 - Comp Plan and LUDC Consistency Analysis, 19. Attachment 18 - Site Transportation Demand Management Plan, 20. Public Comment - Janes, 21. Public Comment - Burke Design, 22. Public Comment - Plein Aire Design Group, 23. Public Comment - Group 1, 24. Public Comment - Cappello & Noel, 25. Public Comment - Chytilo, 26. Public Comment - WE Watch, 27. Public Comment - Pence, 28. Public Comment - Group 2, 29. Planning and Development Memo Dated 4-17-20, 30. Public Comment - Group 3, 31. Public Comment - Group 4, 32. Public Comment - Joseph, 33. Public Comment - Allen, 34. Public Comment - Zaragoza, 35. Presentation - Chytilo Underwood Taylor & Citrin, 36. Staff Presentation, 37. Applicant Presentation, 38. Revised Staff Presentation, 39. Minute Order
Related files: 20-00150

Title

HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Santa Barbara West Coast Farms, LLC Cannabis Cultivation Appeal, Case No. 19APL-00000-00036, Third District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 3 HR.)

 

If your Board wishes to affirm the Planning Commission’s denial of the revised project, staff recommends that your Board take the following actions:

 

a) Deny the Appeal, Case No. 19APL-00000-00036;

 

b) Make the required findings, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings, for denial of the revised project, Case No. 19LUP 00000-00064;

 

c) Determine that denial of the revised project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(5) and State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15061(b)(4) and 15270(a); and

 

d) Deny de novo the revised project, Case No. 19LUP-00000-00064; or

 

Alternatively, if your Board wishes to uphold the appeal, reverse the Planning Commission’s denial, and approve the revised project, staff recommends that you take the following actions:

 

a) Uphold the appeal, Case No. 19APL-00000-00036;

 

b) Make the required findings, including CEQA findings, for approval of the revised project, Case No. 19LUP-00000-00064;

 

c) Determine that the previously certified PEIR (17EIR-00000-00003) constitutes adequate environmental review and no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15168(c)(2); and

 

d) Grant de novo approval of the revised project, Case No. 19LUP-00000-00064, subject to the conditions of approval.

 

COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICY