A motion was made by Supervisor Nelson, seconded by Supervisor Capps, that this
matter be acted on as follows:
a) Approved revised Introduction (First Reading) of an Ordinance of the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara amending Chapter 50 of the Santa
Barbara County Code, Licensing of Cannabis Operations in the unincorporated
area of the County amending the grounds to deny business license applications
and renewal business license applications based on the operator’s failure to file
cannabis tax reports by the due date or failure to pay County cannabis taxes within
60 days of the due date set out in Chapter 50A;
b) Read the title and waive further reading of the Ordinance in full;
c) Set a hearing on the Administrative Agenda for July 18, 2023 to consider
recommendations, as follows:
i) Consider adoption (Second Reading) of an Ordinance of the Board of
Supervisors of the County of Santa Barbara amending Chapter 50 to the Santa
Barbara County Code, Licensing of Cannabis Operations amending the grounds
to deny business license applications and renewal business license applications
based on the operator’s failure to file cannabis tax reports by the due date or
failure to pay county cannabis taxes within 60 days of the due date set out in
Chapter 50A;
ii) Determine for the purposes of CEQA that:
1) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15168(c) these actions are within the
scope of the Cannabis Land Use Ordinance and Licensing Program, and the
Cannabis Land Use Ordinance and Licensing Program Final Programmatic
Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) [Case No. 17EIR-00000-00003, State
Clearinghouse No.2017071016] adequately describes this activity for the
purposes of CEQA; and
2) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15162(a), after considering the PEIR
certified by the Board of Supervisors on February 6, 2018, that no subsequent EIR
or Negative Declaration is required because: i) no substantial changes are
proposed which require major revisions of the PEIR due to the involvement of new
significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified significant effects; ii) no substantial changes have occurred
with respect to the circumstances under which the ordinance is undertaken
which require major revisions of the PEIR due to the involvement of new
significant environmental impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified significant effects; and iii) no new information of substantial
importance concerning the ordinance’s significant effects or mitigation
measures, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise
of reasonable diligence at the time that the PEIR was certified, has been received
that shows any of the following situations elements of CEQA Guidelines Section
15162(3) apply.
The motion carried by the following vote:
5 - Supervisor Williams, Supervisor Capps, Supervisor Hartmann,
Supervisor Nelson, and Supervisor Lavagnino
Ayes:
A-8)
DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE