Title
HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding an appeal, filed by Michael Stoltey, Applicant, of the County Planning Commission’s incomplete application determination for the Richards Ranch (Key Site 26) Project, Fourth District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.)
a) Deny the Appeal, Case No. 25APL-00009;
b) Determine and find that the Application, Case Nos. 24DVP-00018, 24CUP-00033, and 24TRM-00003, is incomplete for the reasons discussed in the associated Board Letter and Staff Report; and
c) Determine that the above recommended action is an administrative activity of the County that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and is therefore not a “project” defined for the purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5).
Alternatively, the Board may take the following action, as follows:
a) Uphold the Appeal, Case No. 25APL-00009;
b) Determine that the Application, Case Nos. 24DVP-00018, 24CUP-00033, and 24TRM-00003, is complete; and
c) Determine that the above recommended action is an administrative activity of the County that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment and is therefore not a “project” defined for the purposes of the CEQA under CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(5).
COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICY