File #: 24-01060    Version:
Type: Departmental Agenda Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 10/4/2024 In control: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
On agenda: 11/5/2024 Final action: 11/5/2024
Title: HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding John Sandford's Appeal, Case No. 23APL-00021, of the Montecito Planning Commission's approval of the Music Academy of the West Revised Conditional Use Permit (Case No. 21RVP-00000-00109), First District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.) a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 23APL-00021; b) Make the required findings for approval of the Project; Case No. 21RVP-00000-00109, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings; c) Determine that the previously certified Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) (03-EIR-06) and Addendum are adequate and no subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162, 15164, and 15168(c)(2); and d) Grant de novo approval of the Project, Case No. 21RVP-00000-00109, subject to the conditions of approval. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICY
Sponsors: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Attachments: 1. Board Letter, 2. Attachment 1 - Findings, 3. Attachment 2 - CUP with Conditions, 4. Attachment 3 - CDP with Conditions, 5. Attachment 4 - CEQA 15164 Letter, 6. Attachment 5 - Appeal Application, 7. Attachment 6 - MPC Action Letter, 8. Attachment 7 - MPC Staff Report, 9. Attachment 8 - Facilitation Memo, 10. Attachment 9 - Project Description, 11. County Counsel Facilitation Report - Memorandum dated 10-23-2024, 12. Public Comment - Appellant Butterfly Beach Association Request for Continuance, 13. Minute Order, 14. Noticing, 15. Public Comment - PASE, 16. Public Comment - Westmont, 17. Public Comment - Group 1, 18. Public Comment - Group 2, 19. Public Comment - Group 3, 20. Public Comment - Group 4, 21. Staff Memorandum dated 10-30-2024, 22. Public Comment - Applicant Letter, 23. Public Comment - Appellant Supplemental Letter, 24. Hyperlink to Appellant Supplemental Letter Exhibits, 25. Public Comment - Appellant Supplemental Letter Exhibits (Part 1), 26. Public Comment - Appellant Supplemental Letter Exhibits (Part 2), 27. Public Comment - Appellant Supplemental Letter Exhibits (Part 3), 28. Public Comment - Appellant Supplemental Letter Exhibits (Part 4), 29. Public Comment - Lotusland, 30. Public Comment - CAMA, 31. Public Comment - Fauver, Large, Archbald & Spray LLP, 32. Public Comment - Group 5, 33. Public Comment - Group 6, 34. Public Comment - Shimokaji, 35. Applicant Presentation, 36. Staff Presentation

Title

HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding John Sandford’s Appeal, Case No. 23APL-00021, of the Montecito Planning Commission’s approval of the Music Academy of the West Revised Conditional Use Permit (Case No. 21RVP-00000-00109), First District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR.)

 

a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 23APL-00021;

 

b) Make the required findings for approval of the Project; Case No. 21RVP-00000-00109, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;

 

c) Determine that the previously certified Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) (03-EIR-06) and Addendum are adequate and no subsequent EIR or Negative Declaration is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162, 15164, and 15168(c)(2); and

 

d) Grant de novo approval of the Project, Case No. 21RVP-00000-00109, subject to the conditions of approval.

 

COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICY