File #: 16-00807    Version: 1
Type: Agenda Item Status: Passed
File created: In control: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
On agenda: 10/18/2016 Final action: 10/18/2016
Title: HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Financing, as follows: (EST. TIME: 30 MIN.) a) Receive and file this briefing on Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Financing; b) Direct staff to either: i) Not pursue Commercial PACE further at this time; or ii) Pursue implementation of a third-party administration model for Commercial PACE and return to the Board at a later date with a budget revision request for funds needed to implement the third-party administration model (which will require a 4/5 vote); and c) Determine that the above recommended actions is not the approval of a project that is subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4), finding that the actions are the creation of a governmental funding mechanism or other government fiscal activity, which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result...
Sponsors: COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Attachments: 1. Board Letter, 2. Attachment 1-CEQA NOE_PACE Financing_15378b4, 3. Attachment 2-PACE Administration Model Options, 4. Attachment 3-LG PACE Survey, 5. Attachment 4-Auditor-Controller Recommendations, 6. Public Comment - W. Michael Hackett, 7. Public Comment - City of Santa Barbara Office of Mayor, 8. Presentation

Title

HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Financing, as follows: (EST. TIME: 30 MIN.)

 

a) Receive and file this briefing on Commercial Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Financing;

 

b) Direct staff to either:

 

i) Not pursue Commercial PACE further at this time; or

 

ii) Pursue implementation of a third-party administration model for Commercial PACE and return to the Board at a later date with a budget revision request for funds needed to implement the third-party administration model (which will require a 4/5 vote); and

 

c) Determine that the above recommended actions is not the approval of a project that is subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b)(4), finding that the actions are the creation of a governmental funding mechanism or other government fiscal activity, which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment, and direct staff to file a Notice of Exemption (NOE).

 

COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICY