File #: 10-00783    Version:
Type: Agenda Item Status: Passed
File created: 8/27/2010 In control: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
On agenda: 9/28/2010 Final action: 9/28/2010
Title: Consider recommendations regarding Amendments to Sections 26-37 of Chapter 26 of the County Code, as follows: a) Consider the adoption (second reading) of an Ordinance amending Section 26-37 of Chapter 26 of the County Code to clarify the definitions that would allow the use of certain pieces of sporting equipment in County Parks for purposes in line with State Department of Fish and Game Regulations, and serve to improve conditions at County Parks such as Cachuma Lake; and b) Upon adoption, approve a Notice of Exemption pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines, Section 15061(b) (3), finding that the Ordinance is not subject to CEQA because of the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment, and further find that there is no possibility that the enactment of the Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment.
Sponsors: PARKS
Attachments: 1. Board Letter 9/7/10, 2. Ordinance, 3. Board Letter/ NOE/ Ordinance 9/21/10, 4. Presentation 9/21/10, 5. Ordinance - Revised 9/21/10

Title

Consider recommendations regarding Amendments to Sections 26-37 of Chapter 26 of the County Code, as follows:

 

a) Consider the adoption (second reading) of an Ordinance amending Section 26-37 of Chapter 26 of the County Code to clarify the definitions that would allow the use of certain pieces of sporting equipment in County Parks for purposes in line with State Department of Fish and Game Regulations, and serve to improve conditions at County Parks such as Cachuma Lake; and

 

b) Upon adoption, approve a Notice of Exemption pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines, Section 15061(b) (3), finding that the Ordinance is not subject to CEQA because of the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment, and further find that there is no possibility that the enactment of the Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment.