|
23-00251
| | Agenda Item | CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-EXISTING LITIGATION
(Paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Government Code section 54956.9)
Clay Murray, et al. v. County of Santa Barbara, et al.; United States District Court, Central District of California, case number 2:17cv-08805-GW-JPR.
Inmates of the Santa Barbara County Jail v. Sheriff; Santa Barbara County Superior Court Case No. SB152487.
Joyce E. Dudley, Santa Barbara County District Attorney v. County of Santa Barbara; Santa Barbara County Superior Court Case No. 22CV05054.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
(Paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) and Paragraph (2) of subdivision (e) of Government Code section 54956.9)
Significant exposure to civil litigation: 1 case, based on these “facts and circumstances:”
The Santa Barbara County District Attorney’s Office has filed a First Amended Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate concerning a Public Records Act request the District Attorney’s Office submitted to the County of Santa Barbara in Case No. 22CV05054. In that Petition, the District Attorney’s Office states th | |
Action details
|
Not available
|
|
23-00371
| 1) | Departmental Agenda | HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Fiscal Year 2023-2024 Preliminary Budget and Budget Development Workshops, as follows:
a) Receive and file information about the Fiscal Year 2023-2024 preliminary budget;
b) Provide direction, if any, regarding items to be addressed or included in the County Executive Officer’s (CEO’s) Recommended Budget, scheduled for release in May and Board adoption scheduled for June 16, 2023 and June 20, 2023;
c) Provide direction regarding Special Issues, including:
i) Affirmation of priority capital projects recommended for funding;
ii) Use of available discretionary revenues for certain non-cannabis program ongoing and one-time costs currently funded by cannabis tax revenue; and
iii) Next steps in evaluating revenue tax measures including polling, where appropriate;
d) Provide other direction, if any, as appropriate; and
e) Determine pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines 15378(b)(4) that the above actions are not a project subject to CEQA review, because it is a government fiscal activity that does not involve | Pass |
Action details
|
Video
|
|
23-00002
| | Agenda Item | Public Comment Period
THE PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD IS RESERVED FOR COMMENT ON MATTERS WITHIN THE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS. EACH PERSON MAY ADDRESS THE BOARD FOR UP TO THREE MINUTES AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CHAIR, FOR A TOTAL PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD OF NO MORE THAN 15 MINUTES. (Resolution No. 09-368) (23-00002)
WHEN TESTIFYING BEFORE THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, PERSONAL ATTACKS AND OTHER DISRUPTIVE BEHAVIOR ARE NOT APPROPRIATE. | |
Action details
|
Video
|