File #:
|
21-01145
Version:
1
|
|
|
Type:
|
Departmental Agenda
|
Status:
|
Agenda Ready
|
On agenda:
|
12/14/2021
|
Final action:
|
12/14/2021
|
Title:
|
HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Case No. 21APL-00000-00027, Bien Nacido Vineyards, et al. appeal of the Planning Commission approval of the Canna Rios, LLC Cannabis Cultivation Project, Case No. 19LUP-00000-00116, Fifth District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR. 30 MIN.)
a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 21APL-00000-00027;
b) Make the required findings for approval of the revised Project, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;
c) Determine that the previously certified Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) (17EIR-00000-00003) is adequate and no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15168(c)(2); and
d) Grant de novo approval of the revised Project, Case No. 19LUP-00000-00116, subject to conditions of approval.
COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICY
|
Attachments:
|
1. Board Letter, 2. Attachment 1 - Findings, 3. Attachment 2 - Conditions of Approval, 4. Attachment 3 - Link to the PEIR, 5. Attachment 4 - CEQA 15168(c)(4) Checklist, 6. Attachment 5 - Appeal Application, 7. Attachment 6 - Planning Commission Staff Report, 8. Attachment 7 - Revised Site Plan Set, 9. Attachment 8 - Well Sharing Agreement, 10. Attachment 9 - Water Analysis Memo, 11. Attachment 10 - Supplemental Appeal Memo, dated September 23, 2021, 12. Attachment 11 - Supplemental Appeal Letter, 13. Attachment 12 - Vizuete Presentation, Dated June 5, 2019, 14. Attachment 13 - Vizuete Presentation, dated August 20, 2019, 15. Attachment 14 - Vizuete Report for Hacienda, 16. Attachment 15 - Facilitation Report, 17. Letter from John Haan Representing Appellant, 18. Summary of Appeal Issues - Courtney Taylor & John Haan representing Appellant, 19. Public Comment - Letter from Law Office of Courtney E. Taylor, 20. Public Comment - Letter from Covington & Burling LLP, 21. Public Comment - Applicant Letter from Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, 22. Public Comment - Exhibits referenced in Applicant Letter from Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, 23. Public Comment - Exhibit G from Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck LLP, 24. Memorandum dated 12-10-2021, 25. Dudek Greenwaste Emmissions Assessment on behalf of Canna Rios, 26. Public Comment - Canna Rios Cultivation Operations Response Letter, 27. Mr. Driscoll's response to Appellant's Water Memo & Peer Review of the Walch Analysis, 28. Appellant Presentation (Canna Rios), 29. Public Comment - O'Neill, 30. Public Comment - ONeill, 31. Memo from Dr. Jim McCord & Memo from John Haan Jr., 32. Replacement No. 1 Appellant Presentation (Canna Rios), 33. Applicant Presentation, 34. Presentation, 35. Minute Order, 36. BOS Action Letter_Canna Rios
|
Title
HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Case No. 21APL-00000-00027, Bien Nacido Vineyards, et al. appeal of the Planning Commission approval of the Canna Rios, LLC Cannabis Cultivation Project, Case No. 19LUP-00000-00116, Fifth District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 1 HR. 30 MIN.)
a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 21APL-00000-00027;
b) Make the required findings for approval of the revised Project, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;
c) Determine that the previously certified Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) (17EIR-00000-00003) is adequate and no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15168(c)(2); and
d) Grant de novo approval of the revised Project, Case No. 19LUP-00000-00116, subject to conditions of approval.
COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICY
|