Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
File #: 19-00213    Version:
Type: Departmental Agenda Status: Agenda Ready
File created: In control: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
On agenda: 9/10/2019 Final action: 9/10/2019
Title: HEARING - Consider the Patterson Avenue Holdings New Office Appeal (Case No. 18APL-00000-00022) filed by Paul Bradford, Appellant, of the Planning Commission's December 5, 2018 approval of Case Nos. 16DVP-00000-00013 and 16BAR-00000-00154, Second District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 40 MIN.) a) Uphold the appeal, Case No. 18APL-00000-00022; b) Make the required findings for denial of the project, Case Nos. 16DVP-00000-00013 and 16BAR-00000-00154, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings; c) Determine that the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15270; and d) Deny de novo Case Nos. 16DVP-00000-00013 and 16BAR-00000-00154; Alternatively, if your Board wishes to deny the appeal and uphold the project, staff recommends that you take the following actions: a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 18APL-00000-00022; b) Make the required findings for approval of the project, Case Nos. 16DVP-00000-00013 and 16BAR-00000-00154, included as Att...
Sponsors: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Attachments: 1. Set Hearing Board Letter - 3/19/2019, 2. ATTACHMENT 1, 3. ATTACHMENT 2, 4. ATTACHMENT 3, 5. ATTACHMENT 4 - Appeal Application, 6. ATTACHMENT 5 - Updated Traffic Study 11.16.18, 7. ATTACHMENT 6 - PC Action Letter 12.11.18, 8. ATTACHMENT 7 - PC Memo dated 11.27.18, 9. ATTACHMENT 8 - PC Staff Report dated 04.25.18, 10. ATTACHMENT 9 - SBAR Minutes, 11. ATTACHMENT 10 - Project Plans 10.25.18, 12. Public Comment - Ferry, 13. Public Comment - Bradford, 14. Minute Order 3/19/2019, 15. Public Comment - Group 1, 16. Public Comment Group 2, 17. Public Comment - Poire, 18. Applicant PowerPoint, 19. Appellant Power Point, 20. Presentation, 21. Minute Order 4/2/2019, 22. Board Letter - 6/4/2019, 23. Attachment 1 - Findings, 24. Attachment 2 - Conditions of Approval, 25. Attachment 3 - Notice of Exemption, 26. ATTACHMENT 4 - Project Plans 05.06.19, 27. Public Comment - Group 3, 28. Public Comment - The Carey Group, Inc (Replacement), 29. Public Comment - Poire, 30. Presentation, 31. Minute Order, 32. Memorandum Regarding Action Options, 33. Memorandum Continuance Request, 34. Minute Order 7/16/2019, 35. Public Comment - Bradford, Paul for 9-10-19, 36. Public Comment - Group 4, 37. Appellant Presentation - 9/10/2019, 38. Minute Order

Title

HEARING - Consider the Patterson Avenue Holdings New Office Appeal (Case No. 18APL-00000-00022) filed by Paul Bradford, Appellant, of the Planning Commission’s December 5, 2018 approval of Case Nos. 16DVP-00000-00013 and 16BAR-00000-00154, Second District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 40 MIN.)

 

a) Uphold the appeal, Case No. 18APL-00000-00022;

 

b) Make the required findings for denial of the project, Case Nos. 16DVP-00000-00013 and 16BAR-00000-00154, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;

 

c) Determine that the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15270; and

 

d) Deny de novo Case Nos. 16DVP-00000-00013 and 16BAR-00000-00154;

 

Alternatively, if your Board wishes to deny the appeal and uphold the project, staff recommends that you take the following actions:

 

a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 18APL-00000-00022;

 

b) Make the required findings for approval of the project, Case Nos. 16DVP-00000-00013 and 16BAR-00000-00154, included as Attachment 1 to the Board Agenda Letter dated June 4, 2019, including CEQA findings;

 

c) Determine that the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, included as Attachment 3 to the Board Agenda Letter dated June 4, 2019; and

 

d) Grant de novo approval of the project, Case Nos. 16DVP-00000-00013 and 16BAR-00000-00154, subject to the conditions included as Attachment 2 to the Board Agenda Letter dated June 4, 2019.

 

COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICY