Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Bookmark and Share
File #: 20-00167    Version:
Type: Departmental Agenda Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 2/27/2020 In control: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
On agenda: 5/5/2020 Final action: 5/5/2020
Title: HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Santa Rita Valley Ag., Inc. Cannabis Cultivation Appeal, Case No. 19APL-00000-00032, Third District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 4 HR.) a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 19APL-00000-00032; b) Make the required findings for approval of the modified project, Case No. 18LUP-00000-00351, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings; c) Determine that the previously certified Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) (Case No. 17EIR-00000-00003) constitutes adequate environmental review and no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15168(c)(2); and d) Grant de novo approval of the project, Case No. 18LUP-00000-00351, subject to the conditions. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S RECOMMENDATION: POLICY
Sponsors: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
Attachments: 1. Board Letter, 2. Attachment 1 - Findings in PDF, 3. Attachment 2 - LUP with Conditions, 4. Attachment 3 - Revised CEQA Checklist in PDF, 5. Attachment 4 - PC Staff Report (1), 6. Attachment 5 - PC Memorandum (1), 7. Attachment 6 - PC Action Letter, 8. Attachment 7 - APCD Advisory, 9. Attachment 8 - BOS Appeal Application, 10. Attachment 9 - Link to PEIR in PDF, 11. Atttachment 10 - Revised Landscape and Screening Plan, 12. Attachment 11 - Fencing Plan, 13. Attachment 12 - Lighting Plan, 14. Attachment 13 - STDMP, 15. Attachment 14 -Comp Plan Consistency in PDF, 16. Attachment 15- LUDC Compliance in PDF, 17. Public Comment - Law Office of Marc Chytilo, 18. Public Comment - University of Califorina, Davis, 19. Appellant Letter - Law Office of Marc Chytilo, 20. Applicant Letter - Land Use Consultant, 21. Public Comment - Grower Shipper Association, 22. Public Comment - Agricultural Adivsory Committee, 23. Public Comment - Group 1, 24. Public Comment - Chytilo Supplemental Material 1, 25. Public Comment - Chytilo Supplemental Material 2, 26. Public Comment - Chytilo Supplemental Letter, 27. Public Comment - Group 2, 28. Memorandum from Planning and Development Dated 03-09-2020, 29. Public Comment - Pierre LaBarge, 30. Public Comment - Ash Land Use Consultant, 31. Appellant Power Point, 32. Applicant Power Point, 33. Presentation, 34. Minute Order, 35. Public Comment - Group 1, 36. Public Comment - Group 2, 37. Staff Presentation - Revised, 38. Withdrawal Memorandum from P&D dated 4-17-2020, 39. Applicant Transportation Plan, 40. Memorandum Attachment 1 - SRVAG Letter to BOS - 4.17.2020, 41. Memorandum Attachment 2 - NOE, 42. Applicant Presentation, 43. Applicant Presentation - REVISED, 44. Appellant Presentation, 45. Staff Presentation REVISED for APRIL 21 2020, 46. Applicant Power Point 04-21 Replacement, 47. Applicant Letter Dated April 18, 2020, 48. Applicant Letter Dated April 19, 2020, 49. P&D Continuance Memorandum dated 4-20-2020, 50. Public Comment - Group 3, 51. Public Comment - Slay, 52. Minute Order 4/21/2020, 53. Applicant PowerPoint for 5-5-2020, 54. Public Comment - Group 4, 55. Public Comment - Letter from FBB&C on behalf of the Appellant, 56. Public Comment - Group 5, 57. Public Comment - Letter from Linda Ash on behalf of Applicant, 58. Public Comment - Caplan Odor Studies Presentation, 59. Public Comment - Caplan Findings of Odor Studies, 60. Applicant Transportation Plan - REVISED, 61. Appellant Presentation - REVISED, 62. Withdrawal Memorandum from P&D Dated 5-4-2020, 63. Public Comment - Group 6, 64. Public Comment - WE Watch Letter, 65. Letter from Marc Chytilo, 66. Public Comment - Group 7, 67. Public Comment - ONeill, 68. Minute Order 5/5/2020
Related files: 20-00149

Title

HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Santa Rita Valley Ag., Inc. Cannabis Cultivation Appeal, Case No. 19APL-00000-00032, Third District, as follows: (EST. TIME: 4 HR.)

 

a) Deny the appeal, Case No. 19APL-00000-00032;

 

b) Make the required findings for approval of the modified project, Case No. 18LUP-00000-00351, including California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings;

 

c) Determine that the previously certified Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) (Case No. 17EIR-00000-00003) constitutes adequate environmental review and no subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15168(c)(2); and

 

d) Grant de novo approval of the project, Case No. 18LUP-00000-00351, subject to the conditions.

 

COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICY