File #: 10-00252    Version:
Type: Agenda Item Status: Passed
File created: 3/5/2010 In control: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
On agenda: 2/1/2011 Final action: 2/1/2011
Title: HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Coastal Commission Action on the County and Montecito Land Use and Development Codes, as follows: (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.) a) Receive and file a report on the Coastal Commission’s action on the County and Montecito Land Use and Development Codes; and b) Direct the Planning and Development Department to prepare the necessary documents to either: i) Accept the Coastal Commission’s certification of the County and Montecito Land Use and Development Codes with suggested modifications; ii) Reject the Coastal Commission’s certification of the County and Montecito Land Use and Development Codes with suggested modifications; or iii) Develop alternatives to the suggested modifications to be resubmitted to the Coastal Commission as a new amendment. COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICY
Sponsors: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Attachments: 1. Board Letter 3/16/10, 2. Board Letter/ Draft Letter to the CA Costal Commission 4/6/10, 3. Memorandum 4/6/10, 4. Presentation 4/6/10, 5. Board Letter/ Attachments 7/6/10, 6. Presentation 7/6/10, 7. Presentation 7/13/10, 8. Board Letter 7/27/10, 9. Presentation 7/27/10, 10. Draft Letter to the Coastal Commission 7/27/10, 11. Requested Revisions to the Suggested Modifications 7/27/10, 12. Board Letter 8/3/10, 13. Draft Letter to the Coastal Commission 8/3/10, 14. Requested Revisions to the Suggested Modifications 8/3/10, 15. Coastal Commission Staff Report 7/28/10, 16. Public Comment - Zimmer, 17. Public Comment - Hope Ranch Park Homes Association 6/23/10, 18. Public Comment - More Mesa Preservation Coalition 6/28/10, 19. Public Comment - Cate School 6/29/10, 20. Public Comment - Geoffrey Rusack 6/29/10, 21. Public Comment - EDC 6/30/10, 22. Public Comment - GVPAC 6/30/10, 23. Public Comment - Hollister Ranch 6/30/10, 24. Public Comment - Kean Ezal 6/30/10, 25. Public Comment - More Mesa Shores 6/30/10, 26. Public Comment - Por La Mar Nursery 6/30/10, 27. Public Comment - Ron Caird 6/30/10, 28. Public Comment - CRC David Hill 6/30/10, 29. Public Comment - SB Cemetery Assocociation 6/30/10, 30. Public Comment - Santa Barbara County Cattlemen's Association 7/1/10, 31. Public Comment - South Coast Habitat Restoration 7/1/10, 32. Public Comment - Tautrim 7/1/10, 33. Public Comment - Gaviota Coast Conservancy 7/2/10, 34. Public Comment - Hollister & Brace 7/2/10, 35. Public Comment - Naples Coalition 7/2/10, 36. Public Comment - Price, Postel & Parma LLC 7/5/10, 37. Public Comment - Sage and Associates 7/5/10, 38. Public Comment - Audobon Society 7/8/10, 39. Public Comment - Egenolf Associates LLP 7/6/10, 40. Public Comment - Cate School 7/20/10, 41. Public Comment - Land Trust for Santa Barbara 7/23/10, 42. Public Comment - Suzanne Elledge 7/26/10, 43. Public Comment - Marc Chytilo 7/27/10, 44. Public Comment - Boise-Cossart, 45. Public Comment - Marc Chytilo 7/26/10, 46. Public Comment - Coastal Ranches Conservancy (Hill) 7/30/10, 47. Public Comment - Elledge 7/30/10, 48. Public Comment - Cattlemen's Association 8/2/10, 49. Public Comment - Coffman 8/2/10, 50. Public Comment - Wulff 7/29/10, 51. Public Comment - Turenchalk 8/3/10, 52. Public Comment - South Coast Habitat Restoration 8/3/10, 53. Public Comment - Koart 8/3/10, 54. Presentation 8/3/10, 55. Final Letter to California Coastal Commission, 56. Public Comment - EDC 8/6/10, 57. Board Letter; Summary of Suggested Modifications 9/7/10, 58. Presentation 9/7/10, 59. Public Comment - Geof Bard, 60. Public Comment - Environmental Defense Center, 61. Continuance Memorandum 11/2/10, 62. Public Comment 11/2/10 - Santa Barbara County Flower & Nursery Growers Association, 63. Public Comment 11/2/10 - Santa Barbara Urban Creeks Council, 64. Public Comment 11/2/10 - Caird, 65. Public Comment 11/2/10 - Por La Mar Nursery, 66. Public Comment 11/9/10 - Dowling, Aaron and Keeler, 67. Public Comment 11/9/10 - Alm, 68. Public Comment 11/9/10 - Conger, 69. Public Comment 11/9/10 - Lowery, 70. Board Letter/ Attachments A and B 11/9/10, 71. Attachment C - 11/2/10 Coastal Commission Staff Report, 72. Presentation 11/9/10, 73. Presentation - Appeals Jurisdiction 11/9/10, 74. Public Comment 11/9/10 - SB Urban Creeks Council, 75. Public Comment 11/9/10 - Behrens, 76. Public Comment 11/9/10 - Egenolf, 77. Public Comment 11/9/10 - Ellersieck, 78. Public Comment 11/9/10 - Klink, 79. Public Comment 11/9/10 - Klink (No. 2), 80. Public Comment 11/9/10 - Lodas, 81. Public Comment 11/9/10 - Lunt, 82. Public Comment 11/9/10 - EDC, 83. Public Comment 11/9/10 - Hope Ranch Riding Trails Association, 84. Public Comment 11/9/10 - Coalition for Sustainable Agriculture, 85. Public Comment 11/9/10 - Turenchalk Planning Services, 86. Public Comment 11/9/10 - Copanas, 87. Public Comment 11/9/10 - Weinheimer, 88. Public Comment 11/9/10 - Landowners, 89. Public Comment 11/9/10 - Williamson, 90. Public Comment 11/9/10 - Surmeier, 91. Public Comment 11/9/10 - SBAOR, 92. Public Comment 11/9/10 - Turenchalk No. 2, 93. Letter to the Coastal Commission 11/15/10, 94. Public Comment 12/14/10 - Caird, 95. Public Comment 12/14/10 - Pacific Legal Foundation, 96. Board Letter 1/18/11, 97. Attachment A - Letter from the County of Santa Barbara to the California Coastal Commission, 98. Attachment B - 11/17/10 Coastal Commission Staff Report Addenda, 99. Attachment C - 12/8/10 Resolution of Certification and Final Suggested Modifications and Findings, 100. Presentation 1/18/11, 101. Presentation Revised 1/18/11, 102. Planning and Development Memorandum 1/18/10, 103. Public Comment 1/18/11 - Grassini, 104. Public Comment 1/18/11 - Roos, 105. Public Comment 1/18/11 - Weinheimer, 106. Public Comment 1/18/11 - Robertson, 107. Public Comment 1/18/11 - Sierra Club, 108. Public Comment 1/18/11 - Chytilo, 109. Public Comment 1/18/11 - EDC, 110. Public Comment 1/18/11 - Emails Combined, 111. Public Comment 1/18/11 - Cachuma Resource Conservation District, 112. Public Comment 1/18/11 - Agricultural Advisory Committee, 113. Public Comment 2/1/11 - Brownstein, Hyatt, et al., 114. Public Comment 2/1/11- Emails Combined, 115. Planning and Development Memorandum 2/1/11, 116. Presentation 2/1/11
Date Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
2/1/2011 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Acted on as follows:Pass Action details Meeting details Not available
1/18/2011 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Acted on as follows:Pass Action details Meeting details Not available
12/14/2010 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Continued, as follows:Pass Action details Meeting details Not available
11/9/2010 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Acted on as follows:Pass Action details Meeting details Not available
11/2/2010 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Continued, as follows:Pass Action details Meeting details Not available
9/7/2010 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Acted on and continued, as follows:Pass Action details Meeting details Not available
8/3/2010 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Acted on and continued, as follows:Pass Action details Meeting details Not available
7/27/2010 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Acted on and continued, as follows:Pass Action details Meeting details Not available
7/13/2010 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Acted on and continued, as follows:Pass Action details Meeting details Not available
7/6/2010 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Acted on and continued, as follows:  Action details Meeting details Not available
4/6/2010 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Acted on and continued, as follows:Pass Action details Meeting details Not available
3/16/2010 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Set for a hearing, as follows:Pass Action details Meeting details Not available

Title

HEARING - Consider recommendations regarding Coastal Commission Action on the County and Montecito Land Use and Development Codes, as follows: (EST. TIME: 45 MIN.)

 

a) Receive and file a report on the Coastal Commission’s action on the County and Montecito Land Use and Development Codes; and

 

b) Direct the Planning and Development Department to prepare the necessary documents to either:

 

i) Accept the Coastal Commission’s certification of the County and Montecito Land Use and Development Codes with suggested modifications;

 

ii) Reject the Coastal Commission’s certification of the County and Montecito Land Use and Development Codes with suggested modifications; or

 

iii) Develop alternatives to the suggested modifications to be resubmitted to the Coastal Commission as a new amendment.

 

COUNTY EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: POLICY